Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Guy's avatar
Oct 1Edited

The distinctive feature of the U.S. playbook for war is that it does everything possible to bait its would be victim into an overt attack so that the U.S. can portray itself as the victim ("good guy") fighting a morally justified and necessary "defensive" war against the aggressor ("bad guys, evildoers, axis of evil"). It does this to manipulate emotions to bring its own population, normally not enthusiastic about war, to support its war (or be silenced as traitors). Americans are programmed to believe they are the virtuous good guys with the white hats. This has been the pattern from the beginning. The Boston Tea Party to get the British to attack, pushing the Confederates to attack Fort Sumter, blowing up the Maine to justify Spanish American War, inventing the Zimmerman memo, cutting of oil to the Japanese to provoke the attack at Pearl Harbor, the Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11 and WMDs for Afghanistan and Iraq, the list goes on. It's been the method in Ukraine and this is the latest chapter. Given the stakes, Putin has wisely been trying to short-circuit the progress of this scenario. I don't believe we should be joining the parade, whatever its emotional appeal.

Expand full comment
Kent Ramsay's avatar

I think Putin is just as capable of arranging public commentary that is "misinformation" and "misdirection" as Trump, or even more capable. Since it is clear Trump desperately wants war in Iran and Russia and who knows where else, Putin may well be sending signals to confuse the imbecile US and NATO bosses, whoever they are. Most of the information now emanating is "fog". The only thing one can rely on is death and destruction and stupidity from Trump and serious, sober and well reasoned strategy from Putin. One of the two is trying to save the world from Nuclear Holocaust.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts